• Home
  • About Us
  • Forensic Services
  • Our Experts
  • Locations
  • Contact Us
  • Awards
  • Careers
  • Featured Projects
  • Continuing Education
  • News & Events

U.S. Forensic

  • Home
  • Client Resources
  • Submit an Assignment
Featured Projects
  • About Us
    • Leadership
    • Qualifications
    • Professional Organizations
  • Forensic Services
  • Our Experts
  • Locations
  • Contact Us
    • Submit an Assignment
    • Client Resources
    • Sign Up for Emails
    • Customer Satisfaction Survey
  • Awards
  • Careers
  • Education
  • Featured Projects
  • News & Events

Key Analysis

October 17, 2016 in Featured Projects

Jeff Stark, P.E.

Jeff Stark, P.E.

Background

U. S. Forensic was retained by our client to perform a key analysis.  It was reported that a 2003 Chevrolet Trailblazer was reported stolen.  There were 2 keys and a single keyless entry transmitter for the vehicle.  Both of the keys and the keyless entry transmitter for the vehicle had been accounted for; but at the time of the evaluation, the vehicle had not yet been recovered.   The 2 keys and the single keyless entry transmitter for the Chevrolet were examined, tested and photographed by Jeffrey P. Stark, P.E. and Forensic Locksmith at the U.S. Forensic facility in Metairie, Louisiana.

The 2003 Chevrolet Trailblazer was equipped with the General Motor’s Passlock vehicle theft deterrent system.  The design of the Passlock system is to prevent vehicle theft by disabling the engine unless the ignition lock cylinder rotates properly by engaging the correct ignition key.  The theft deterrent system has been incorporated into the body control module (BCM).  The theft deterrent is provided in order to prevent vehicle operation if the correct key is not used in order to start the vehicle.  The ignition key turns the lock cylinder, and the cylinder rotation produces an analog voltage code in the Passlock sensor.  This voltage code is received by the BCM, and the BCM compares the voltage code to the previously learned voltage code. If the codes match, a class 2 message is sent from the BCM to the powertrain control module (PCM) to enable the fuel injectors that will allow the engine to start.

Typically, 2 keys and 2 keyless entry transmitters were issued with the vehicle when the vehicle left the factory, and the vehicle used 1 key for all the locks on the vehicle. The key for this year model vehicle is a 10-cut key with 4 depths for the cuts.  The ignition lock cylinder for this vehicle utilizes cuts 1 through 9.  The door lock cylinders utilize cuts 3 through 9, the lift gate lock cylinder utilizes cuts 4 through 10, and the optional glove box lock cylinder utilizes cuts 7 through 10.

Evaluation

Physical/Microscopic Evaluation

The keys were examined under 40X and 100X microscopes.  Neither of the keys presented were an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) issued key for the vehicle.  The mechanical cuts on both of the keys matched and the observations made to both of the keys were nearly identical.  Further examination revealed that both of the keys were aftermarket keys manufactured by HY-KO for a non-transponder vehicle and were the correct type used for this year model vehicle.

Examination of the blades of the keys revealed that both of the key blades had the proper nickel-plate over brass core finish.  There was no tarnish, dirt or wear observed on the blades from normal use.  There were tool marks on the key blades that would indicate the keys were recently used in a duplicating process.  The ramps, curves, and slopes of the key cuts on both keys were worn down from extensive buffing of the key cuts and not long-term use.  There were diagonal striations across the cuts of the key consistent with the buffing of the key cuts using a metal radial wire wheel.  There were no markings observed on top of the diagonal striations across the key cuts consistent with the key having been inserted into or used to operate a lock cylinder.

Decoding of Keys

The cuts of the keys were measured using a plastic dial caliper and the bittings were decoded from bow to tip as 3431124221.  Using the VIN from the subject vehicle, the original factory key code was obtained from the manufacturer.  The key code that was issued to the subject vehicle at the factory was S199C for both the ignition and compartment keys.  This key code was cross-referenced to key cuts using a key code decoder program.  The key cuts from bow to tip based on the key code provided were noted as 1232424312, which did not match the cuts of the keys issued for examination.

Based on the evidence observed, it is our opinion that both key number 1 and key number 2 were newly cut keys and had not been used to operate a lock cylinder after being buffed extensively with a metal radial wire wheel.

Findings

Examination and analysis of the keys presented for the vehicle revealed that both of the keys were aftermarket keys.  There was evidence that indicated the keys were used in a duplicating process and had been recently buffed extensively with a metal radial wire wheel.  There was no evidence that indicated either key was used to operate a lock cylinder after being buffed extensively with a metal radial wire wheel.

The keys did not contain the correct cuts to operate any of the lock cylinders that the vehicle was originally equipped with from the factory.  If the ignition lock cylinder for the subject vehicle had been replaced, one would expect the ignition lock cylinder to have been rekeyed to match the original key cuts for the vehicle or the vehicle would have 2 keys with different mechanical key cuts, 1 new key to operate the new ignition lock cylinder and another key with the original key cuts from the factory to operate the door lock cylinders, lift gate lock cylinder and the optional glove box lock cylinder.  It would be rare and unusual for all of the lock cylinders on the vehicle to have been rekeyed for a key that was different from what was originally issued from the factory.

Examination of the keyless entry transmitter presented for the vehicle revealed that the transmitter was an OEM issued remote keyless entry fob transmitter of the proper type used for this model year vehicle remote locking system.  The plastic housing of the transmitter displayed evidence indicative of long-term wear from normal use.  The long-term wear of the transmitter did not match the minimal amount of wear observed on the keys presented for examination.

There are possible methods to defeat or bypass the theft deterrent system of the Chevrolet.  One method involves either drilling the center of the ignition lock cylinder or between the cylinder housing and the side bar location and then force rotating the lock cylinder.  Another method would be to apply pressure on the sidebar with a tool while attempting to pick the lock cylinder.  If either of these methods were used, there would be evidence of tool marks on the wafers, sidebar and the keyway of the faceplate.  Examination of the vehicle, once recovered, would be required to determine if there was any evidence of an attempt to bypass the ignition lock cylinder.

In order for the vehicle to have been started and driven away, a proper key was used that contained the correct mechanical cuts which allowed the rotation of the ignition lock cylinder and also allowed the Passlock sensor to produce and send an analog voltage code to the Body Control Module (BCM) that matched the previously learned voltage code.  The BCM then sent a class 2 message to the Powertrain Control Module (PCM) that enabled the fuel injectors and allowed the engine to start.

Photographs

View of Key No. 1
Microscopic view of the cuts of the key for key No. 1. Note the diagonal striations on the surface of the key cuts with no markings on top of the striations from recent use in a lock cylinder and the rounded edges of the cuts from extensive buffing.

View of the tip of the blade of key No. 2. Note the rounded edge of the key cuts and the markings on the blade from buffing.
Microscopic view of the cuts of the key for key No. 2. Note the diagonal striations on the surface of the key cuts and the rounded edges of the cuts from extensive buffing.

View of the testing of the key transponder.
View of the testing of the keyless entry transmitter.

Welcoming NC, SC, & VA Client Services Manager

January 26, 2023 in News & Events

Solidifying a Case: Forensic Engineering’s Role in Subrogation

January 5, 2023 in News & Events

Honoring Our Veterans

November 11, 2022 in News & Events

New Locations – Milwaukee & Tuscaloosa

October 6, 2022 in News & Events

Mr. Fontenot, P.E. Joins Our Team of Mechanical Experts – Louisiana

September 14, 2022 in News & Events

What Our Clients Are Saying

"Great communications, and the work performed was done in a timely manner. It covered all the areas we were looking for and the finished report was very detailed and easy to understand. Great that the investigator follows up with a phone call to cover any questions that one may have about the information in the report."

"I would say that my experience has always been exceptional. I love working with Michelle Hughes as she is very prompt and attentive to your needs. She gets the assignments to where it needs to be very timely and the engineer's report is always on point and easy to comprehend. If I run into any issues with ascertaining any clarity, the engineers have always in the past been easy to reach and willing to provide any necessary additional information needed."

"Assignment accepted and acknowledged very promptly. Engineer made prompt contact and communicated throughout the process. Report completed and returned very promptly. The whole process was done in a very professional manner. All individuals involved from Michelle Hughes to Brian Darr are to be commended."

"I have used U.S. Forensic for several years in my capacity as a General Adjuster and always receive excellent and on-time service. I would highly recommend them to anyone needing assistance with an insurance claim."

"Great engineer assigned. We had some difficulty contacting policyholder on several occasions and Dennis hung in there with us. Providing timely and excellent service."

"I love working with U.S. Forensic as I have had a great working relationship with Michelle Hughes for multiple years at several other insurance companies. She makes it very easy and stress free for assignments and just a great overall individual that represents the company to the fullest. The work product is great as well."

"US Forensic is always willing to go the extra mile when asked and even when not asked. I appreciate their timely responses, reports and contact with our insureds. In addition their invoices are fair! We love US Forensic! Thanks for all that you do for us!"

"Very easy to submit claim to US Forensics for them to start a case. Very quick response time with acceptance of case and updates on the case. Very detailed report that is easy to read and understand. Very pleased with experience."

"Always a pleasure to work with your knowledgeable staff and engineers."

"Very thorough, efficient and timely. Great communication throughout process."

"From submitting the claim through receiving results, I'm 100% satisfied, and will definitely be keeping US Forensic on speed-dial for any new claims in LA. Thank you so much!"

"I recently called Michelle Hughes for some help...Because of system issues US Forensic is unable to provide the engineers contact info with their [automated] email however, Michelle, quickly figured out a solution. I love working with Michelle, she really is the best rep I've personally ever dealt with! Thank you Michelle and to US Forensic staff! You guys really do make our jobs easier!"

"Mike Deharde was extremely knowledgeable and very thorough, his report was very detailed and helpful to overall resolution of the claim. I would love to work with him again."

"Friendly, knowledgeable and thorough staff. I always appreciate your assistance no matter the type of claim."

"Very satisfied with the services provided by US Forensic. Quick turnaround time, knowledgeable engineers, professional reports and easy to understand conclusions. Highly recommend them for any insurance related investigations!"

“I used them many times around the country for mechanical failure and fire O&C claims. They are very detailed and professional with their inspections and write a very solid easy to follow report.”

“Professional engineers that provide great, quality services. Michelle Hughes has done continuing education for our company... I’d definitely recommend US Forensic.”

“Great company to work with, the engineers are very well trained and knowledgeable in their prospective fields…I am always pleased with the service I receive on the assignments given to your organization.”

“USF is an absolute fantastic place to work with a great environment and culture!”

“The response is always very prompt with initial results reported promptly so we can take appropriate action.”

“This company is great. I would highly recommend them. I dealt with Rob and his customer service and attention to detail is superb.”

Employment Opportunities

U.S. Forensic: Family-Like Culture & High Quality Results

On October 23rd, The Times-Picayune and The New Orleans Advocate published an article highlighting the U.S. Forensic organization and why it was … Read More

Engineering Opportunities in Chicago

Hiring Civil & Structural Engineers U.S. Forensic is hiring civil and structural engineers in the Chicago area to perform forensic evaluations.  … Read More

Civil Engineering Opportunities in Louisiana

Engineering Career Opportunities in Louisiana U.S. Forensic, a forensic engineering firm providing services throughout the U.S., has full-time and … Read More

See All Employment Opportunities

Contact Us

U.S. Forensic Main Office
3201 Ridgelake Drive
Metairie, LA 70002
Map

(504) 831-7001 Office
(888) 873-0012 Toll Free
(888) 436-3092 Fax

Email Us

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

General Conditions
of Service Contract

SiteLock
Anchorage, AK · Atlanta, GA · Austin, TX · Birmingham, AL · Buffalo, NY · Charlotte, NC · Cheyenne, WY · Chicago, IL · Cleveland, OH · Columbia, SC · Dallas, TX · Denver, CO · Des Moines, IA · Destin, FL · Detroit, MI · Flint, MI · Ft. Myers, FL · Grand Junction, CO · Greensboro, NC · Greenville, SC · Hattiesburg, MS · Houston, TX · Indianapolis, IN · Jackson, MS · Jacksonville, FL · Kansas City, MO · Lafayette, LA · Lansing, MI · Las Vegas, NV · Lexington, KY · Los Angeles, CA · Macon, GA · Memphis, TN · Miami, FL · Milwaukee, WI · Minneapolis, MN · Mobile, AL · Nashville, TN · New Orleans, LA · New York City, NY · Newark, NJ · Norfolk, VA · Oklahoma City, OK · Omaha, NE · Orlando, FL · Philadelphia, PA · Phoenix, AZ · Picayune, MS · Pittsburgh, PA · Portland, ME · Pueblo, CO · Salt Lake City, UT · San Antonio, TX · San Francisco, CA · Santa Fe, NM · Seattle, WA · St. Louis, MO · Stratford, CT · Syracuse, NY · Tallahassee, FL · Tampa, FL · Toledo, OH · Tuscaloosa, AL · Washington D.C. · West Palm Beach, FL

© 2023 U.S. Forensic · Privacy Policy · web design

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL cookies.
Cookie Settings   Accept
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT