• Home
  • About Us
  • Forensic Services
  • Our Experts
  • Locations
  • Contact Us
  • Awards
  • Careers
  • Featured Projects
  • Continuing Education
  • News & Events

U.S. Forensic

  • Home
  • Client Resources
  • Submit an Assignment
Featured Projects
  • About Us
    • Leadership
    • Qualifications
    • Professional Organizations
  • Forensic Services
  • Our Experts
  • Locations
  • Contact Us
    • Submit an Assignment
    • Client Resources
    • Sign Up for Emails
    • Customer Satisfaction Survey
  • Awards
  • Careers
  • Education
  • Featured Projects
  • News & Events

Sinkhole or Something Else?

January 4, 2021 in Featured Projects, News & Events

Sinkhole Evaluation

U.S. Forensic was asked to perform a sinkhole evaluation.  It was reported that a commercial building in North Carolina had a suspected sinkhole formation that occurred in the soils beneath an interior portion of a concrete floor slab.   The result was cracking and displacement of a portion of the concrete floor slab.  Another engineering firm was hired, but could not rule out a sinkhole. Our engineer, Joel Howard, P.E. was asked to determine the cause and extent of the reported conditions.

Case Background

The building addition, where the cracks and displacement were present, was constructed in 1976.
The historical use of the building was to store pallets of yarn, and large portions of the floor were normally covered with yarn pallets so that the entire floor was typically not visible. The maximum weight of the pallets was 2,200 pounds (2 stacked pallets), and the white colored markings on the floor was designation for the location of the pallets.

warehouse sinkhole evaluationIn April of 2020, the concrete floor was pressure washed.  The current cracks were not present at that time, but the building owner was not aware of when the raveled edges and cracks along the movement joint occurred.  The owner reported that the week of September 11, 2020, a forklift operator reported a concern with the concrete floor slab and noted “it felt different.” On September 18, 2020, movement was experienced with the concrete slab.  The owner reported that she was not sure if a sinkhole was present beneath the concrete slab.  She was concerned because of what she described as a circular crack pattern.

Analysis and Discussion

As part of the sinkhole evaluation, we were requested to review cracks in an existing concrete floor slab. The reported cause for the cracks in the concrete and the concern was related to the formation of a sinkhole.

The United States Geological Survey defines a sinkhole as “an area of ground that has no natural external surface drainage–when it rains, the water stays inside the sinkhole and typically drains into the subsurface.”  Our client defines a sinkhole as “the sudden settlement or collapse of earth supporting the covered property into subterranean voids created by the action of water on a limestone or similar rock formation.”

At the property, the topography sloped downward in the north direction. Downspouts directed water away from the building, downslope at the north side of the building. There was some erosion of the soils that undermined the slab edge along the north wall;  however, the engineer observed that the eroded areas stopped and there were no deeply eroded soil areas where water could backflow southward beneath the building slab.  The loading dock at the west end of the subject building indicated that some backfilled soils were present at the subject property beneath the interior floor slab.  The area of concern was located within the interior of the building, south of the exterior north wall.

Within the building, the engineer measured the concrete slab which had joints that formed large slab sections of up to 32 feet by 48 feet.  Along the formed joint, there were cracked edges consistent with loading from forklift traffic.  Along the circular cracks, the edges were worn and chipped. The noted condition of the cracked concrete surfaces was consistent with cracks not recently formed.

The removed slab section revealed the concrete was installed over soil and there was no aggregate base. The color of the soil beneath the concrete slab was orange and consistent with a clay based soil. Within the removed slab section, there was no dowel reinforcing to prevent differential movement of the slab across each joint. The soil beneath the slab was either in direct contact with the bottom of the concrete or very close to the bottom of the concrete.  Measurements of the slab indicated the cracked portion of the slab was raised relative to other floor areas.

The physical evidence indicated there was soil beneath the interior removed section of the concrete slab and drainage at the property would direct water away from the cracked concrete slab section.  These conditions were not consistent with the formation of a sinkhole beneath the building.  Multiple causes for the cracked concrete slab include oversized slab sections that allowed excessive shrinkage and curling, no aggregate interlock or doweling across the joint that allowed differential movement, base soils that were consistent with compressible soils, available soil information indicated the potential for shrink swell movement, forklift traffic, and overloading of the concrete at the joint from pallets and the forklift due to no shear transfer mechanism.

Current construction of concrete slabs requires formed joints spaced at 2 to 3 times the slab thickness in feet. For example, a 4-inch thick concrete slab should have joints spaced no greater than 12-feet on center. The spacing of the joints can be increased if the slab is engineered and includes steel reinforcing. Concrete slabs that are used for storage loading and forklift loading often require engineering that includes proper compaction of the sub-base, engineered fill beneath the slab, steel reinforcing in the slab, and steel shear transfer dowels across formed slab joints.  The engineer’s review of the existing concrete slab indicated that the construction of the slab was susceptible to shrinkage cracks, differential movement of the slab, and cracks related to overloading of the slab.

View of the rear north side of the building located north of the subject floor area.
View of the rear north side of the building located north of the subject floor area.
View of the subject floor area facing east.

View of a section of the subject crack in the concrete floor.
View of separation between the 2 slab sections at the sawcut joint.
View of cracks in the concrete slab along the joint.

View of the subject floor at the location of the circular cracks.
View of the machine cutting into the floor.
View of a measurement showing the thickness of the concrete slab.

View of the removed section of concrete slab and the soil beneath the removed slab section.
View of a forklift reportedly used in the warehouse.
View of a column with a twisted flange.

Sinkhole Evaluation Conclusions

The physical evidence observed and measured at the property indicated there was soil beneath the interior removed section of the concrete slab and drainage at the property would direct water away from the cracked concrete slab section. The noted conditions were not consistent with the formation of a sinkhole beneath the building. Multiple causes for the cracked concrete slab include oversized slab sections that allowed excessive shrinkage and curling, no aggregate interlock or doweling across the joint that allowed differential movement, base soils that were consistent with compressible soils, available soil information indicated the potential for shrink swell movement, forklift traffic, and overloading of the concrete at the joint from pallets and the forklift due to no shear transfer mechanism.

For more information about related forensic services, please visit our Structural Evaluations page.

Announcing the 2023 CE Seminar Series

March 16, 2023 in News & Events

Visit us at PLRB & CLM Conferences

March 15, 2023 in News & Events

Welcoming NC, SC, & VA Client Services Manager

January 26, 2023 in News & Events

Solidifying a Case: Forensic Engineering’s Role in Subrogation

January 5, 2023 in News & Events

Honoring Our Veterans

November 11, 2022 in News & Events

What Our Clients Are Saying

"Great communications, and the work performed was done in a timely manner. It covered all the areas we were looking for and the finished report was very detailed and easy to understand. Great that the investigator follows up with a phone call to cover any questions that one may have about the information in the report."

"I would say that my experience has always been exceptional. I love working with Michelle Hughes as she is very prompt and attentive to your needs. She gets the assignments to where it needs to be very timely and the engineer's report is always on point and easy to comprehend. If I run into any issues with ascertaining any clarity, the engineers have always in the past been easy to reach and willing to provide any necessary additional information needed."

"Assignment accepted and acknowledged very promptly. Engineer made prompt contact and communicated throughout the process. Report completed and returned very promptly. The whole process was done in a very professional manner. All individuals involved from Michelle Hughes to Brian Darr are to be commended."

"I have used U.S. Forensic for several years in my capacity as a General Adjuster and always receive excellent and on-time service. I would highly recommend them to anyone needing assistance with an insurance claim."

"Great engineer assigned. We had some difficulty contacting policyholder on several occasions and Dennis hung in there with us. Providing timely and excellent service."

"I love working with U.S. Forensic as I have had a great working relationship with Michelle Hughes for multiple years at several other insurance companies. She makes it very easy and stress free for assignments and just a great overall individual that represents the company to the fullest. The work product is great as well."

"US Forensic is always willing to go the extra mile when asked and even when not asked. I appreciate their timely responses, reports and contact with our insureds. In addition their invoices are fair! We love US Forensic! Thanks for all that you do for us!"

"Very easy to submit claim to US Forensics for them to start a case. Very quick response time with acceptance of case and updates on the case. Very detailed report that is easy to read and understand. Very pleased with experience."

"Always a pleasure to work with your knowledgeable staff and engineers."

"Very thorough, efficient and timely. Great communication throughout process."

"From submitting the claim through receiving results, I'm 100% satisfied, and will definitely be keeping US Forensic on speed-dial for any new claims in LA. Thank you so much!"

"I recently called Michelle Hughes for some help...Because of system issues US Forensic is unable to provide the engineers contact info with their [automated] email however, Michelle, quickly figured out a solution. I love working with Michelle, she really is the best rep I've personally ever dealt with! Thank you Michelle and to US Forensic staff! You guys really do make our jobs easier!"

"Mike Deharde was extremely knowledgeable and very thorough, his report was very detailed and helpful to overall resolution of the claim. I would love to work with him again."

"Friendly, knowledgeable and thorough staff. I always appreciate your assistance no matter the type of claim."

"Very satisfied with the services provided by US Forensic. Quick turnaround time, knowledgeable engineers, professional reports and easy to understand conclusions. Highly recommend them for any insurance related investigations!"

“I used them many times around the country for mechanical failure and fire O&C claims. They are very detailed and professional with their inspections and write a very solid easy to follow report.”

“Professional engineers that provide great, quality services. Michelle Hughes has done continuing education for our company... I’d definitely recommend US Forensic.”

“Great company to work with, the engineers are very well trained and knowledgeable in their prospective fields…I am always pleased with the service I receive on the assignments given to your organization.”

“USF is an absolute fantastic place to work with a great environment and culture!”

“The response is always very prompt with initial results reported promptly so we can take appropriate action.”

“This company is great. I would highly recommend them. I dealt with Rob and his customer service and attention to detail is superb.”

Employment Opportunities

U.S. Forensic: Family-Like Culture & High Quality Results

On October 23rd, The Times-Picayune and The New Orleans Advocate published an article highlighting the U.S. Forensic organization and why it was … Read More

Engineering Opportunities in Chicago

Hiring Civil & Structural Engineers U.S. Forensic is hiring civil and structural engineers in the Chicago area to perform forensic evaluations.  … Read More

Civil Engineering Opportunities in Louisiana

Engineering Career Opportunities in Louisiana U.S. Forensic, a forensic engineering firm providing services throughout the U.S., has full-time and … Read More

See All Employment Opportunities

Contact Us

U.S. Forensic Main Office
3201 Ridgelake Drive
Metairie, LA 70002
Map

(504) 831-7001 Office
(888) 873-0012 Toll Free
(888) 436-3092 Fax

Email Us

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

General Conditions
of Service Contract

SiteLock
Anchorage, AK · Atlanta, GA · Austin, TX · Birmingham, AL · Buffalo, NY · Charlotte, NC · Cheyenne, WY · Chicago, IL · Cleveland, OH · Columbia, SC · Dallas, TX · Denver, CO · Des Moines, IA · Destin, FL · Detroit, MI · Flint, MI · Ft. Myers, FL · Grand Junction, CO · Greensboro, NC · Greenville, SC · Hattiesburg, MS · Houston, TX · Indianapolis, IN · Jackson, MS · Jacksonville, FL · Kansas City, MO · Lafayette, LA · Lansing, MI · Las Vegas, NV · Lexington, KY · Los Angeles, CA · Macon, GA · Memphis, TN · Miami, FL · Milwaukee, WI · Minneapolis, MN · Mobile, AL · Nashville, TN · New Orleans, LA · New York City, NY · Newark, NJ · Oklahoma City, OK · Omaha, NE · Orlando, FL · Pharr, TX · Philadelphia, PA · Phoenix, AZ · Picayune, MS · Pittsburgh, PA · Portland, ME · Pueblo, CO · Raleigh, NC · Richmond, VA · Salt Lake City, UT · San Antonio, TX · San Francisco, CA · Santa Fe, NM · Seattle, WA · St. Louis, MO · Stratford, CT · Syracuse, NY · Tallahassee, FL · Tampa, FL · Toledo, OH · Tuscaloosa, AL · Washington D.C. · West Palm Beach, FL

© 2023 U.S. Forensic · Privacy Policy · web design

We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL cookies.
Cookie Settings   Accept
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT